Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Dogs and Their History

There is inconsistency in the idea that in the early days of settlement the people of this world, has a friend and companion of some sort indigenous representative of the modern dog us, and that in return for help to protect wildlife and conservation sheep and the goats, he gave part of his life, a corner of the dwelling, and grew in confidence and care for her. Probably the animal was led initially nothing more than an unusually gentle jackal, wolf, or troubled by their comrades from the marauding pack to seek refuge in a foreign country.
Be found in almost all regions of the world traces of an indigenous dog family, the only exception of the Caribbean, Madagascar, the eastern Aegean islands of Malaysia, New Zealand and the Polynesian islands, where there is no indication that any dog or wolf Fuchs is a true native animals. He remained in the ancient eastern land, and generally in the early Mongolians, wild dogs and neglected for centuries, PROWLING in packs, the lean wolf, as it begins to creep into the streets and walls of all towns in the East. This was not an attempt to attract them to improve human society and their respect. It is not until you come to the archives of the higher civilizations of Assyria and Egypt to discover that it will consider all the different varieties of canine form.
The great variety of different breeds of dogs and large differences in size, tips, and general appearance are facts which are hard to believe that they might have a common ancestor. Consider the difference between the Mastiff and the Japanese Spaniel, the Deerhound and the fashionable Pomeranian, the St. Bernard and the Black and Tan Terrier Miniature and allows the loss of their common ancestor. But the difference is greater than that between the Shire horse and pony Shetland, the Shorthorn cattle and Kerry, or the Patagonian and the Pygmy and all dog breeders know how easy it is to produce a variety in type and extent of the choice of study .
To understand this issue, you should first check the identity of the structure of the wolf and dog. This identity of structure may be better than the systems of bone or skeletons of two animals that look so close that their implementation should be recognized and studied. The spine of the dog consists of seven vertebrae in the neck, back, thirteen, seven in the loins, three sacral vertebra and twenty-twenty-two tail. In dogs and wolves, there were thirteen pairs of ribs, nine true and four false. Everyone is forty-two teeth. They both have five front and back legs, four toes, while outwardly the common wolf has so much to the emergence of a large dog-Bare Bones, a popular description is used for others.
Also necessary to distinguish their habits. Natural Voice of Wolf, a loud voice, but it is limited to barking dogs to learn. Although predator will eat vegetables and, when unhealthy eating grass. When a pack of hunting wolves will divide the parties to attend a driver for the career path to another retirement, exercise a considerable amount of strategy, a train emitted by a number of our hounds and terriers when hunting in groups.
Another important point of resemblance between the Canis lupus and Canis familiaris lies in the fact that during pregnancy in both types of sixty-three days. It is three to nine boys away a wolf, and are blind for twenty-one day. They are nursed for two months time, but at the end of this period, be able to eat half the meat to digest for spitting from their mother or their father.

No comments:

Post a Comment